Barnard v. Greenville Family Court
This text of Barnard v. Greenville Family Court (Barnard v. Greenville Family Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6384
JOE DAVID BARNARD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GREENVILLE FAMILY COURT; AMY C. SUTHERLAND, Chief Administrative Judge,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-3427-8-20BI)
Submitted: April 29, 2004 Decided: May 6, 2004
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joe David Barnard, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Joe David Barnard appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Barnard v. Greenville Family Court, No. CA-03-
3427-8-20BI (D.S.C. Nov. 26, 2003). We deny Barnard’s motion for
appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Barnard v. Greenville Family Court, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnard-v-greenville-family-court-ca4-2004.