Barnard v. Glisson
This text of 103 S.E. 189 (Barnard v. Glisson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Copies of the proceedings in the magistrate’s court being necessary to a proper understanding and determination of the errors complained of in the petition for certiorari, and they nowhere appearing in the record, and no exception having been taken to the magistrate’s answer, the trial judge, on motion of defendant in certiorari; properly dismissed the certiorari. See Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. State, 116 Ga. 845 (43 S. E. 254).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
103 S.E. 189, 25 Ga. App. 357, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnard-v-glisson-gactapp-1920.