Barnard v. Glisson

103 S.E. 189, 25 Ga. App. 357, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 803
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 12, 1920
Docket11389
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 103 S.E. 189 (Barnard v. Glisson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barnard v. Glisson, 103 S.E. 189, 25 Ga. App. 357, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 803 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Smith, J.

Copies of the proceedings in the magistrate’s court being necessary to a proper understanding and determination of the errors complained of in the petition for certiorari, and they nowhere appearing in the record, and no exception having been taken to the magistrate’s answer, the trial judge, on motion of defendant in certiorari; properly dismissed the certiorari. See Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. State, 116 Ga. 845 (43 S. E. 254).

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur. Certiorari; from Tattnall superior court — Judge Sheppard. February 2, 1920. Elders & DeLoach, for plaintiff in error. Way & McCall, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lewis v. Standard Co.
135 S.E. 101 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 S.E. 189, 25 Ga. App. 357, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnard-v-glisson-gactapp-1920.