Barnard v. Glisson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Barnard v. Glisson

103 S.E. 189, 25 Ga. App. 357, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 803

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 12, 1920·No. 11389·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Smith, J.

Copies of the proceedings in the magistrate’s court being necessary to a proper understanding and determination of the errors complained of in the petition for certiorari, and they nowhere appearing in the record, and no exception having been taken to the magistrate’s answer, the trial judge, on motion of defendant in certiorari; properly dismissed the certiorari. See Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. State, 116 Ga. 845 (43 S. E. 254).

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Certiorari; from Tattnall superior court — Judge Sheppard. February 2, 1920.

Elders & DeLoach, for plaintiff in error. Way & McCall, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, J.

Copies of the proceedings in the magistrate’s court being necessary to a proper understanding and determination of the errors complained of in the petition for certiorari, and they nowhere appearing in the record, and no exception having been taken to the magistrate’s answer, the trial judge, on motion of defendant in certiorari; properly dismissed the certiorari. See Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. State, 116 Ga. 845 (43 S. E. 254).

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Certiorari; from Tattnall superior court — Judge Sheppard. February 2, 1920.

Elders & DeLoach, for plaintiff in error. Way & McCall, contra.

Barnard v. Glisson, 103 S.E. 189, 25 Ga. App. 357, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 803 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

103 S.E. 189 (Barnard v. Glisson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related