Barnard v. Durham

Fourth Circuit

Barnard v. Durham

88 F. App'x 641

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 26, 2004·No. No. 03-7899·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Joe David Barnard appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Barnard v. Durham, No. CA-03-3321-6-20BI (D.S.C. Nov. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade[642] quately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Joe David Barnard appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Barnard v. Durham, No. CA-03-3321-6-20BI (D.S.C. Nov. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade[642] quately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Barnard v. Durham, 88 F. App'x 641 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

88 F. App'x 641 (Barnard v. Durham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related