Barnard v. Childs
This text of 241 A.D. 905 (Barnard v. Childs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Sears; P. J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the ground that there was evidence to the effect that it was agreed between the Investors’ Underwriting Corporation and the plaintiff to the knowledge of the defendants that the securities and cash credited to the Investors’ Underwriting Corporation should remain the property of the plaintiff so that the plaintiff might demand the return thereof subject at all times to the lien of defendants and that, therefore, a prima facie case was established.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
241 A.D. 905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnard-v-childs-nyappdiv-1934.