Barnard & Russell Enterprises, Inc. v. Calvin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Barnard & Russell Enterprises, Inc. v. Calvin

296 So. 2d 115, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 6943

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 9, 1974

DocketNo. U-56

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 296 So. 2d 115 (Barnard & Russell Enterprises, Inc. v. Calvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barnard & Russell Enterprises, Inc. v. Calvin, 296 So. 2d 115, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 6943 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition for certiorari pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, Chapter 120, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., to review the final order of respondent granting an application of P & M Transit Company, Inc., doing business as Honda of Daytona, for a license as a motor vehicle dealer to sell Honda products in the Day-tona area. Respondent here made substantially the same findings in granting an application in Hess Marine, Inc. v. Calvin, Fla.App., 296 So.2d 114, in which this court’s opinion has been filed on this date. [116]*116The rulings of this court in Hess Marine, Inc., likewise apply in this case. Respondent’s findings do not meet the requirements of Section 320.642, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., for .the granting of this application and preclude the granting of same since respondent affirmatively found that the presently licensed franchise dealer is furnishing adequate service in its locality.

Certiorari is granted, respondent’s order is quashed, and respondent is directed to rescind the license issued to intervenor, P & M Transit Company, Inc., doing business as Honda of Daytona.

RAWLS; C. J., and McCORD and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition for certiorari pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, Chapter 120, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., to review the final order of respondent granting an application of P & M Transit Company, Inc., doing business as Honda of Daytona, for a license as a motor vehicle dealer to sell Honda products in the Day-tona area. Respondent here made substantially the same findings in granting an application in Hess Marine, Inc. v. Calvin, Fla.App., 296 So.2d 114, in which this court’s opinion has been filed on this date. [116]*116The rulings of this court in Hess Marine, Inc., likewise apply in this case. Respondent’s findings do not meet the requirements of Section 320.642, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., for .the granting of this application and preclude the granting of same since respondent affirmatively found that the presently licensed franchise dealer is furnishing adequate service in its locality.

Certiorari is granted, respondent’s order is quashed, and respondent is directed to rescind the license issued to intervenor, P & M Transit Company, Inc., doing business as Honda of Daytona.

RAWLS; C. J., and McCORD and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

296 So. 2d 115, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 6943, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnard-russell-enterprises-inc-v-calvin-fladistctapp-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack