Barnao v. Barnao

227 A.D. 736, 236 N.Y.S. 748

Opinion

Order denying plaintiff’s motion for counsel fee and alimony affirmed, without costs, without prejudice to a reargument of this appeal in the event that the plaintiff in this action is finally successful in the annulment action brought against her by her husband, in which judgment has been entered against her. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnao v. Barnao, 227 A.D. 736, 236 N.Y.S. 748 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

227 A.D. 736 (Barnao v. Barnao) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.