Barmes v. Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners, Self-Insured
This text of 582 So. 2d 135 (Barmes v. Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners, Self-Insured) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Barmes appeals the order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) refusing to allow attorney’s fees for the employer’s alleged wrongful denial of compensability or, in the alternative, for bad faith. Competent substantial evidence supports the JCC’s findings that a brief suspension of temporary total disability benefits was reasonable in light of the circumstances and that the reinstatement of temporary total disability benefits and the subsequent acceptance of claimant as permanently and totally disabled were timely. As this court held in Rusty Pelican Restaurant v. Garcia, 437 So.2d 754 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), and City of Tampa v. Kopkau, 429 So.2d 381 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), attorney’s fees are not awardable where the employer admits an accident, pays benefits, ceases paying benefits based on erroneous information, and promptly and voluntarily resumes and retroactively pays such benefits upon discovery of such erroneous information. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
582 So. 2d 135, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6551, 1991 WL 119681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barmes-v-pinellas-county-board-of-county-commissioners-self-insured-fladistctapp-1991.