Barlow v. Wrightsville & Tennille Railroad

152 S.E. 902, 170 Ga. 332, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 448
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 15, 1930·No. No. 7364·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Hill, J.

Wrightsville & Tennille Railroad Company brought an equitable petition- against W. R. Barlow, to enjoin him from trespassing on a certain tract of land adjoining the right of way of the company, and from erecting a building thereon, the company claiming the land. The defendant in his answer claimed title to the land in question. On the trial of the case evidence was introduced tending to show that the parties owned adjoining tracts of land. The jury found for the plaintiff. The defendant filed a motion for new trial on the usual general grounds only. There being evidence to support the verdict, .the judgment overruling the motion for new trial will not be disturbed. See Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co. v. Brock, 141 Ga. 840 (82 S. E. 225).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barlow v. Wrightsville & Tennille Railroad, 152 S.E. 902, 170 Ga. 332, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 448 (Ga. 1930).

152 S.E. 902 (Barlow v. Wrightsville & Tennille Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wimpy v. Gilreath
243 S.E.2d 77 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1978)