Barlow v. Virginia

Fourth Circuit

Barlow v. Virginia

124 F. App'x 214

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 31, 2005·No. No. 05-1014·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Clinton C. Barlow appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and his subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See Barlow v. Virginia, No. CA-04-734-2 (E.D. Va. Dec. 9, 2004; Feb. 16, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Clinton C. Barlow appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and his subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See Barlow v. Virginia, No. CA-04-734-2 (E.D. Va. Dec. 9, 2004; Feb. 16, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Barlow v. Virginia, 124 F. App'x 214 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

124 F. App'x 214 (Barlow v. Virginia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.