Barlow v. United Parcel Service
This text of Barlow v. United Parcel Service (Barlow v. United Parcel Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
After filing his Notice of Appeal 26 February 1996, plaintiff failed to file an Industrial Commission Form 44, such filing being required by Workers' Compensation Rule 701 (2), or in any other way pursue the appeal.
Therefore, after careful consideration and for good cause shown, defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Appeal to the Full Commission is GRANTED, and said appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
No additional costs are assessed.
S/ ______________________________ THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER
CONCURRING:
S/ ________________________________ LAURA KRANIFELD MAVRETIC COMMISSIONER
S/ _________________________________ BERNADINE S. BALLANCE COMMISSIONER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Barlow v. United Parcel Service, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barlow-v-united-parcel-service-ncworkcompcom-1996.