Barlow v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Barlow v. State

291 S.E.2d 783, 162 Ga. App. 482, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 3135

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 28, 1982

Docket64206

StatusPublished

This text of 291 S.E.2d 783 (Barlow v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barlow v. State, 291 S.E.2d 783, 162 Ga. App. 482, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 3135 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Deen, Presiding Judge.

Appellant’s appointed counsel has filed a motion in this court requesting permission to withdraw and, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493) (1967) and Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406) (1976), filed a brief raising points of law which might arguably support the appeal. Pursuant to the rulings in Anders and Bethay, we conducted an extensive exam[483]*483ination of the record and transcript filed in this case in order to determine if the appeal is, in fact, frivolous. Based upon that review, we have granted counsel’s motion to withdraw and find that the requirements of Anders and Bethay have been met, that no reversible error appears in the record and that a rational trier of fact could have found from the evidence presented at trial that the appellant was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Drayton v. State, 157 Ga. App. 872 (278 SE2d 758) (1981).

Decided May 28, 1982. Willis B. Sparks III, District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Sognier and Pope, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deen, Presiding Judge.

Appellant’s appointed counsel has filed a motion in this court requesting permission to withdraw and, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493) (1967) and Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406) (1976), filed a brief raising points of law which might arguably support the appeal. Pursuant to the rulings in Anders and Bethay, we conducted an extensive exam[483]*483ination of the record and transcript filed in this case in order to determine if the appeal is, in fact, frivolous. Based upon that review, we have granted counsel’s motion to withdraw and find that the requirements of Anders and Bethay have been met, that no reversible error appears in the record and that a rational trier of fact could have found from the evidence presented at trial that the appellant was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Drayton v. State, 157 Ga. App. 872 (278 SE2d 758) (1981).

Decided May 28, 1982. Willis B. Sparks III, District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Sognier and Pope, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

291 S.E.2d 783, 162 Ga. App. 482, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 3135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barlow-v-state-gactapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack