Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Barlow v. State

Barlow v. State

99 S.E. 798, 24 Ga. App. 122, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 442
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 22, 1919
Docket10479
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 99 S.E. 798 (Barlow v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barlow v. State, 99 S.E. 798, 24 Ga. App. 122, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 442 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. The court did not abuse its discretion in overruling the motion for a continuance based upon the absence of an alleged material witness, it not appearing that the witness resided within the county. The witness being in the United States Army, there was no reason to expect that he would be present at the next term of the court.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict, which was approved by the trial judge. Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworih, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Curry v. State
340 S.E.2d 250 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)
Griffin v. State
69 S.E.2d 665 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Tyree v. State
39 S.E.2d 441 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1946)
Bowers v. Fred W. Amend Co.
35 S.E.2d 15 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1945)
James v. State
32 S.E.2d 431 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 S.E. 798, 24 Ga. App. 122, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barlow-v-state-gactapp-1919.