Barlow v. State
115 So. 73, 115 So. 78, 22 Ala. App. 288, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 3
Opinion
It was unnecessary to file a complaint in the circuit court, but, on appeal from the county court, the prosecution might proceed under the original affidavit. Code 1923, § 4646.
The court may never tell the jury how they shall consider testimony. Hence appellant’s written charge A was properly refused.
We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barlow v. State, 115 So. 73, 115 So. 78, 22 Ala. App. 288, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 3 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).
115 So. 73 (Barlow v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moseley v. Alabama Power Co.
21 So. 2d 305 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1945)
Turner v. State
191 So. 392 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1939)