Barlow v. Esterling

1 Miss. 302
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1827
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Miss. 302 (Barlow v. Esterling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barlow v. Esterling, 1 Miss. 302 (Mich. 1827).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT — bst the

Hon. EDWARD TURNER.

On an inspection of the record, it appears that this cause was commenced before a Justice of the Peace in-Perry county; that the justice rendered judgment against the defendant below for a penalty of five dollars, besides costs; that the Judge of Probate of said county granted to the defendant below a certiorari, to remove the cause into the county court of said county; which court reversed the judgment of said justice; that the judge of the fourth judicial district granted to the appellee a writ of certiorari, to remove the cause into the circuit court of said county; which court reversed the judgment of the county court and remanded the cause to the county court.

The Judge of Probate has no power to issue a writ of certiorari, and erred in assuming jurisdiction thereof, and this court proceeding to give such judgment as the circuit court should have given, considers that the judgment of the circuit court, reversing the judgment of the county court, be affirmed, and that so much of the judgment of the circuit court, as remands the cause to the county court, be reversed.

Judges Child and Winchester concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Miss. 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barlow-v-esterling-miss-1827.