Barlow v. Comm'r of Corr.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Barlow v. Comm'r of Corr.

150 A.3d 680, 323 Conn. 906, 2016 Conn. LEXIS 268

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 13, 2016·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The respondent's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 166 Conn.App. 408, 142 A.3d 290 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that General Statutes § 51-183c required the habeas court to grant the petitioner's motion for recusal?

"2. If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the habeas court improperly barred the petitioner from presenting new evidence on remand for purposes of proving prejudice?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The respondent's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 166 Conn.App. 408, 142 A.3d 290 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that General Statutes § 51-183c required the habeas court to grant the petitioner's motion for recusal?

"2. If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the habeas court improperly barred the petitioner from presenting new evidence on remand for purposes of proving prejudice?"

Barlow v. Comm'r of Corr., 150 A.3d 680, 323 Conn. 906, 2016 Conn. LEXIS 268 (Colo. 2016).

Pincite

150 A.3d 680 (Barlow v. Comm'r of Corr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related