Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/Barlow v. Comm'r of Corr.

Barlow v. Comm'r of Corr.

150 A.3d 680, 323 Conn. 906, 2016 Conn. LEXIS 268
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 13, 2016
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 150 A.3d 680 (Barlow v. Comm'r of Corr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barlow v. Comm'r of Corr., 150 A.3d 680, 323 Conn. 906, 2016 Conn. LEXIS 268 (Colo. 2016).

Opinion

The respondent's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 166 Conn.App. 408, 142 A.3d 290 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that General Statutes § 51-183c required the habeas court to grant the petitioner's motion for recusal?

"2. If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the habeas court improperly barred the petitioner from presenting new evidence on remand for purposes of proving prejudice?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barlow v. Comm'r of Corr.
182 A.3d 78 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
150 A.3d 680, 323 Conn. 906, 2016 Conn. LEXIS 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barlow-v-commr-of-corr-conn-2016.