Barlow v. Atlantic City

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Barlow v. Atlantic City

78 A. 11, 80 N.J.L. 510, 51 Vroom 510, 1910 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 11

DecidedNovember 16, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 78 A. 11 (Barlow v. Atlantic City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barlow v. Atlantic City, 78 A. 11, 80 N.J.L. 510, 51 Vroom 510, 1910 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 11 (N.J. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garrison, J.

The question presented by this writ of certiorari is whether the prosecutor who was elected to and holds the office of overseer of the poor of Atlantic City is a city officer, and as such subject to be removed from office under section 7 of “An act relating to, regulating and providing for the government' of cities” (Pamph. L. 1903, p. 384), which, by the tacit assumption of counsel, constitutes the charter of Atlantic City. The pertinent provision of said section is that any city officer may be removed from office by resolution of city council for good cause shown upon complaint, notice and a hearing.

Section 3 provides that there shall be elected for each city one overseer of the poor, and section 19 prescribes the powers and duties of such overseer.

We think that an officer thus 'chosen to perform the duties thus prescribed is a city officer within the meaning of section 7 of the charter, and that the proceeding instituted under its provisions should be affirmed as within the jurisdiction conferred by the charter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garrison, J.

The question presented by this writ of certiorari is whether the prosecutor who was elected to and holds the office of overseer of the poor of Atlantic City is a city officer, and as such subject to be removed from office under section 7 of “An act relating to, regulating and providing for the government' of cities” (Pamph. L. 1903, p. 384), which, by the tacit assumption of counsel, constitutes the charter of Atlantic City. The pertinent provision of said section is that any city officer may be removed from office by resolution of city council for good cause shown upon complaint, notice and a hearing.

Section 3 provides that there shall be elected for each city one overseer of the poor, and section 19 prescribes the powers and duties of such overseer.

We think that an officer thus 'chosen to perform the duties thus prescribed is a city officer within the meaning of section 7 of the charter, and that the proceeding instituted under its provisions should be affirmed as within the jurisdiction conferred by the charter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 A. 11, 80 N.J.L. 510, 51 Vroom 510, 1910 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barlow-v-atlantic-city-nj-1910.