Barlow & Seelig Manufacturing Co. v. Patch

236 Wis. 223
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 3, 1940
StatusPublished

This text of 236 Wis. 223 (Barlow & Seelig Manufacturing Co. v. Patch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barlow & Seelig Manufacturing Co. v. Patch, 236 Wis. 223 (Wis. 1940).

Opinion

Wickhem, J.

The sole question debated upon this appeal is whether in entering the judgment appealed from the circuit court followed the mandate of this court. If it did, the judgment so entered is the judgment of this court and cannot be appealed from. If it did not, the remedy is by mandamus, and this court will not entertain an appeal. The sole remedy of defendant is an original action invoking the supervisory power of this court to compel the lower court to follow its mandate. Falk v. Wisconsin Tax Comm. 204 Wis. 518, 235 N. W. 925; Miswald-Wilde Co. v. Armory Realty Co. 213 Wis. 354, 251 N. W. 450. It follows that defendant’s appeal must be dismissed.

By the Court. — Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Falk v. Wisconsin Tax Commission
235 N.W. 925 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1931)
Miswald-Wilde Co. v. Armory Realty Co.
251 N.W. 450 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
236 Wis. 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barlow-seelig-manufacturing-co-v-patch-wis-1940.