Barley v. Buell

9 P. 549, 70 Cal. 335, 1886 Cal. LEXIS 788
California Supreme Court·Decided July 30, 1886·No. No. 11173·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Belcher, C. C.

This action was commenced to recover the sum of ten thousand dollars for services alleged to have been rendered by the plaintiff in procuring a loan for the defendant.

The defendant demurred to the complaint, and his demurrer being overruled, answered.

The case was tried by a jury, and a verdict returned in favor of the plaintiff for three thousand dollars, on which judgment was entered.

The appeal is from the judgment, and rests upon the judgment roll.

It is claimed for the appellant that the complaint was insufficient, and that the court erred in overruling the demurrer. The complaint was undoubtedly somewhat ambiguous, but it was not demurred to on that ground. In our opinion, it stated a cause of action for the three thousand dollars recovered, and that the alleged promise to pay that sum was based upon a sufficient consideration.

We think the judgment should be affirmed.

Foote, 0., and Searls, 0., concurred.

The Court.

For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barley v. Buell, 9 P. 549, 70 Cal. 335, 1886 Cal. LEXIS 788 (Cal. 1886).

9 P. 549 (Barley v. Buell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Estate of Dickinson
125 P.2d 542 (California Court of Appeal, 1942)
Miller v. Turner
253 N.W. 437 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1934)
Lipsmeier v. Vehslage
29 F. 175 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri, 1886)