Barksdale v. State
122 S.E. 96, 31 Ga. App. 787, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 194
This text of 122 S.E. 96 (Barksdale v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Barksdale v. State, 122 S.E. 96, 31 Ga. App. 787, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 194 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).
Opinion
The accused was convicted of manufacturing whisky, and his motion for a new trial was based upon the usual general grounds only. There was some evidence authorizing the verdict, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
122 S.E. 96, 31 Ga. App. 787, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barksdale-v-state-gactapp-1924.