Barksdale v. State

100 S.E. 771, 24 Ga. App. 341, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 628
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Barksdale v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Ga. App. 115
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 4, 1919·No. 10778·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. The court substantially charged, as requested by the defendant, and, in view of the evidence, the charge of the court was most fair to the defendant.

2. The evidence amply authorized the jury to find that the defendant was in possession of many gallons of whisky, and of material and equipment for making more. lie had in his house clothes arid shoes covered with the “slops” from the still, etc. The trial court approved the verdict; no error of law is shown; the defendant had a fair trial by a jury of his people; and it was proper to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barksdale v. State, 100 S.E. 771, 24 Ga. App. 341, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 628 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

100 S.E. 771 (Barksdale v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.