Barksdale v. Owens

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 27, 2006
• Docket: 05-2273
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-2273

BRYNILDSON BARKSDALE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CARROLL ANN OWENS; MAGGIE FRADY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (CA-04-21971-6)

Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 27, 2006

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brynildson Barksdale, Appellant Pro Se. Sherman Brook Fowler, CARTER, SMITH, MERRIAM, ROGERS & TRAXLER, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Brynildson Barksdale appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil complaint for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Barksdale v. Owens, No. CA-04-21971-6 (D.S.C.

Oct. 17, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -