Barksdale v. Owens

Fourth Circuit

Barksdale v. Owens

172 F. App'x 515

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 27, 2006·No. No. 05-2273·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Brynildson Barksdale appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Barksdale v. Owens, No. CA-04-21971-6, 2005 WL 2654252 (D.S.C. Oct. 17, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con[516]*516tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Brynildson Barksdale appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Barksdale v. Owens, No. CA-04-21971-6, 2005 WL 2654252 (D.S.C. Oct. 17, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con[516]*516tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Barksdale v. Owens, 172 F. App'x 515 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

172 F. App'x 515 (Barksdale v. Owens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.