Barksdale v. Medina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Barksdale v. Medina

272 A.D.2d 78, 707 N.Y.S.2d 322, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4890

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 4, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 272 A.D.2d 78 (Barksdale v. Medina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barksdale v. Medina, 272 A.D.2d 78, 707 N.Y.S.2d 322, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4890 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Clark Richardson, J.), entered on or about July 9, 1999, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by respondent father’s brief, denied respondent’s motion to vacate a prior order, same court (Marjory Fields, J.), entered on or about May 20, 1999, temporarily changing the subject child’s custody from respondent to petitioner maternal grandmother upon a finding of extraordinary circumstances and directing a hearing on the child’s best interests, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent’s arrest on weapons charges constituted extraordinary circumstances justifying a temporary change of custody pending a hearing on the child’s best interests. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Tom, Wallach and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Clark Richardson, J.), entered on or about July 9, 1999, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by respondent father’s brief, denied respondent’s motion to vacate a prior order, same court (Marjory Fields, J.), entered on or about May 20, 1999, temporarily changing the subject child’s custody from respondent to petitioner maternal grandmother upon a finding of extraordinary circumstances and directing a hearing on the child’s best interests, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent’s arrest on weapons charges constituted extraordinary circumstances justifying a temporary change of custody pending a hearing on the child’s best interests. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Tom, Wallach and Lerner, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 78, 707 N.Y.S.2d 322, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barksdale-v-medina-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack