Barksdale v. Angelone
This text of 42 F. App'x 657 (Barksdale v. Angelone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Kenneth W. Barksdale seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Barksdale v. Angelone, No. CA-00-1726-AM (E.D.Va. Mar. 18, 2002). We deny Barksdale’s motions to compel discovery and to suppress. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court *658 and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 F. App'x 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barksdale-v-angelone-ca4-2002.