Barksdale v. Angelone

42 F. App'x 657
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 20, 2002·No. 02-6565·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth W. Barksdale seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Barksdale v. Angelone, No. CA-00-1726-AM (E.D.Va. Mar. 18, 2002). We deny Barksdale’s motions to compel discovery and to suppress. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court *658 and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barksdale v. Angelone, 42 F. App'x 657 (4th Cir. 2002).

42 F. App'x 657 (Barksdale v. Angelone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related