Barks v. Barks

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Barks v. Barks

18 S.E.2d 509, 66 Ga. App. 542, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 214

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 15, 1942

Docket29362.

StatusPublished

This text of 18 S.E.2d 509 (Barks v. Barks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barks v. Barks, 18 S.E.2d 509, 66 Ga. App. 542, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 214 (Ga. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Felton, J.

1. The evidence authorized the findings that the relationship of landlord and tenant existed between the plaintiffs and the defendant, that the defendant had paid rent over a period of years, but that he had not paid for the year preceding the dispossessory warrant. It was consequently not error for the court to overrule the motion for new trial based solely on the general grounds, no error of law appearing. Roo ks v. Mercer, 42 Ga. App. 294 (156 S. E. 44).

*543 Decided January 15, 1942. O. H. Dalton, for plaintiffs in error. D. W. Mitchell, W. M. Henderson, contra.

2. The question of the propriety of the introduction of evidence is not before this court for decision in the absence of an amendment to the motion for new trial complaining of the error in admitting the evidence.

Judgnpent affirmed.

Stephens, P. J., and Sutton, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI