Barks v. Barks

18 S.E.2d 509, 66 Ga. App. 542, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 214
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 15, 1942·No. 29362.·Published

Opinion

Felton, J.

1. The evidence authorized the findings that the relationship of landlord and tenant existed between the plaintiffs and the defendant, that the defendant had paid rent over a period of years, but that he had not paid for the year preceding the dispossessory warrant. It was consequently not error for the court to overrule the motion for new trial based solely on the general grounds, no error of law appearing. Roo ks v. Mercer, 42 Ga. App. 294 (156 S. E. 44).

*543 Decided January 15, 1942. O. H. Dalton, for plaintiffs in error. D. W. Mitchell, W. M. Henderson, contra.

2. The question of the propriety of the introduction of evidence is not before this court for decision in the absence of an amendment to the motion for new trial complaining of the error in admitting the evidence.

Judgnpent affirmed.

Stephens, P. J., and Sutton, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barks v. Barks, 18 S.E.2d 509, 66 Ga. App. 542, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 214 (Ga. Ct. App. 1942).

18 S.E.2d 509 (Barks v. Barks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rooks v. Mercer
156 S.E. 44 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)