Barkovic v. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

788 N.W.2d 11, 488 Mich. 863, 2010 Mich. LEXIS 1886
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 15, 2010·No. 141472·Published

Opinion

788 N.W.2d 11 (2010)

Timothy S. BARKOVIC, Plaintiff,
v.
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD, Defendant.

Docket No. 141472.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 15, 2010.

Order

On the order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief prior to the scheduled attorney discipline proceedings.

MARILYN J. KELLY, C.J., and HATHAWAY and DAVIS, JJ., would grant the requested relief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barkovic v. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD, 788 N.W.2d 11, 488 Mich. 863, 2010 Mich. LEXIS 1886 (Mich. 2010).

788 N.W.2d 11 (Barkovic v. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.