Barkley v. Pierce

Fourth Circuit

Barkley v. Pierce

262 F. App'x 526

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 25, 2008·No. No. 07-7316·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Emmett Barkley appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Barkley v. Pierce, No. 1:07-cv01974-JFM (D.Md., Aug. 21, 2007). We further deny as moot Barkley’s motion for expedited adjudication of this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately [527]*527presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Emmett Barkley appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Barkley v. Pierce, No. 1:07-cv01974-JFM (D.Md., Aug. 21, 2007). We further deny as moot Barkley’s motion for expedited adjudication of this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately [527]*527presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Barkley v. Pierce, 262 F. App'x 526 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

262 F. App'x 526 (Barkley v. Pierce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related