Barkley v. . Patterson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Barkley v. . Patterson

169 S.E. 926, 204 N.C. 803, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 300

DecidedJune 14, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 169 S.E. 926 (Barkley v. . Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barkley v. . Patterson, 169 S.E. 926, 204 N.C. 803, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 300 (N.C. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee CueiaM.

In this cause a judgment was rendered by a justice of the peace in favor of the plaintiffs and the defendants appealed. The ease was not docketed in the Superior Court, at the term next ensuing the trial and no motion for a recordari was made at that time; but the trial court found as a fact that counsel for the defendants had not been negligent and had been induced to believe that the controversy would be settled without appeal. Upon the findings of fact the court permitted the appeal to be docketed. The plaintiffs excepted and appealed. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee CueiaM.

In this cause a judgment was rendered by a justice of the peace in favor of the plaintiffs and the defendants appealed. The ease was not docketed in the Superior Court, at the term next ensuing the trial and no motion for a recordari was made at that time; but the trial court found as a fact that counsel for the defendants had not been negligent and had been induced to believe that the controversy would be settled without appeal. Upon the findings of fact the court permitted the appeal to be docketed. The plaintiffs excepted and appealed. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

169 S.E. 926, 204 N.C. 803, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barkley-v-patterson-nc-1933.