Barkley v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Barkley v. New York City Housing Authority

208 A.D.2d 449, 618 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9786

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 20, 1994·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from an order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eugene Nardelli, J.), entered March 22, 1993, which denied plaintiff’s motion to reargue a prior order, entered June 18, 1991, granting defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

Plaintiff did not present new facts or newly decided case law in her motion to renew and reargue; therefore, the IAS Court properly characterized the motion as one for reargument (Bowen v Sherwood Sec. Corp., 189 AD2d 592), the denial of which is non-appealable. Concur—Carro, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman, Ross and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eugene Nardelli, J.), entered March 22, 1993, which denied plaintiff’s motion to reargue a prior order, entered June 18, 1991, granting defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

Plaintiff did not present new facts or newly decided case law in her motion to renew and reargue; therefore, the IAS Court properly characterized the motion as one for reargument (Bowen v Sherwood Sec. Corp., 189 AD2d 592), the denial of which is non-appealable. Concur—Carro, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman, Ross and Williams, JJ.

Barkley v. New York City Housing Authority, 208 A.D.2d 449, 618 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9786 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

208 A.D.2d 449 (Barkley v. New York City Housing Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related