Barkley v. New York City Housing Authority

208 A.D.2d 449, 618 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9786
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 20, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 208 A.D.2d 449 (Barkley v. New York City Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barkley v. New York City Housing Authority, 208 A.D.2d 449, 618 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9786 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

Appeal from an order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eugene Nardelli, J.), entered March 22, 1993, which denied plaintiff’s motion to reargue a prior order, entered June 18, 1991, granting defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

Plaintiff did not present new facts or newly decided case law in her motion to renew and reargue; therefore, the IAS Court properly characterized the motion as one for reargument (Bowen v Sherwood Sec. Corp., 189 AD2d 592), the denial of which is non-appealable. Concur—Carro, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman, Ross and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schneider v. 17 Battery Place North Associates II
289 A.D.2d 164 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 A.D.2d 449, 618 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barkley-v-new-york-city-housing-authority-nyappdiv-1994.