Barker's & Wife's Lessee v. Rice

2 Del. Cas. 116
CourtDelaware Court of Common Pleas
DecidedDecember 18, 1798
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Del. Cas. 116 (Barker's & Wife's Lessee v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Delaware Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barker's & Wife's Lessee v. Rice, 2 Del. Cas. 116 (Del. Super. Ct. 1798).

Opinion

Johns, J.

This cause has been so fully and ably argued before you, the Court [rules] as to the law. First, as to the construction of [the] will, we are of opinion the devise in question does not pass a fee, but only a life estate. Second, whether the conveyance from Jeremiah Ball, Jr., to Thomas Rice (if he was sane) is such as the Act of Assembly makes a good conveyance in fee, it is to have the operation in England of a feoffment. Whether deed is such as the Act contemplates, we leave with you to decide. If it does operate a forfeiture, the Statute [of] Limitation begins in 1748, if not it will begin in 1776.

Verdict for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Del. Cas. 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barkers-wifes-lessee-v-rice-delctcompl-1798.