Barker's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Barker's Estate

28 A. 365, 159 Pa. 518, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 886

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 29, 1894

DocketAppeals, Nos. 172 and 178

StatusPublished

Cited by24 cases

This text of 28 A. 365 (Barker's Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barker's Estate, 28 A. 365, 159 Pa. 518, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 886 (Pa. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Scott’s appeal.

Pee. Cubiam,

All the facts necessary to a proper understanding of the questions involved in this case are clearly and concisely stated in the opinion of the learned auditing judge, and need not be repeated. A consideration of the questions arising upon said facts has led us to the conclusion that they were rightly decided, and for reasons given in said opinion we think the decree of the court below should be affirmed.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by appellant.

mellob’s appeal.

Pee Cubiam,

January 29, 1894:

This case was argued with Anna B. Scott’s Appeal from same decree and involves precisely the same questions. For reasons briefly stated in the per curiam opinion just filed in that case, No. 172 of this term, the decree should be affirmed.

Decree-affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI