Barker v. Young
This text of Barker v. Young (Barker v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 11-AUG-2022 01:09 PM SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX Dkt. 5 OGAC
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ________________________________________________________________
PHILLIP J. BARKER, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,
vs.
CHRISTOPHER YOUNG, ADMINISTRATOR, HAWAIʻI CRIMINAL JUSTICE DATA CENTER Respondent/Defendant-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; 1CSP-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)
Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Phillip J. Barker’s application for writ of certiorari filed on July 8, 2022 is hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, August 11, 2022.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Barker v. Young, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barker-v-young-haw-2022.