Barker v. Walkenhorst

Missouri Court of Appeals

Barker v. Walkenhorst

533 S.W.3d 792

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 21, 2017

DocketWD 80400

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 533 S.W.3d 792 (Barker v. Walkenhorst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barker v. Walkenhorst, 533 S.W.3d 792 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam

Douglas B. Walkenhorst, Kathy L. Walkenhorst, and their limited liability company, K and D Transportation LLC (collectively, “the Walkenhorsts”) appeal the circuit court’s judgment on the pleadings in favor of Ronald K. Barker, P.C, (“Barker”) on Barker’s quantum meruit claims for attorney’s fees. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam

Douglas B. Walkenhorst, Kathy L. Walkenhorst, and their limited liability company, K and D Transportation LLC (collectively, “the Walkenhorsts”) appeal the circuit court’s judgment on the pleadings in favor of Ronald K. Barker, P.C, (“Barker”) on Barker’s quantum meruit claims for attorney’s fees. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

533 S.W.3d 792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barker-v-walkenhorst-moctapp-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack