Barker v. Thomas

67 S.E. 1, 85 S.C. 82, 1910 S.C. LEXIS 194
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMarch 1, 1910
Docket7460
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 67 S.E. 1 (Barker v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barker v. Thomas, 67 S.E. 1, 85 S.C. 82, 1910 S.C. LEXIS 194 (S.C. 1910).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. ChiEE Justice Jones.

This is an action for the recovery of real estate and was tried before Judge Memminger and a jury. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s testimony, motion for nonsuit was made and refused. Defendants offering no testimony, the case was submitted to the jury upon the testimony offered by plaintiffs. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of defendants, which Judge Memminger set aside of his own motion on the ground that it was inconsistent with the testimony. Defendants appeal upon exceptions to the refusal of nonsuit and the granting of a new trial.

1 An appeal from an order refusing nonsuit is not allowed before final judgment is rendered. Agnew v. Adams, 24 S. C., 86.

2 An appeal from an order granting a new trial will not be entertained except in a case in which judgment absolute might be rendered by this Court. Lampley v. Atlantic, 11 S. C., 319, 57 S. E., 1104; Jones v. Woodside Cotton Mills, 83 S. C., 565 and other cases cited therein.

This is not a case in which judgment absolute may be rendered.

The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keels v. Powell
50 S.E.2d 704 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1948)
Hayes v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
13 S.E.2d 921 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1941)
Snipes v. Davis, Director General
127 S.E. 447 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1925)
Floyd v. Page
117 S.E. 409 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1923)
Parham-Thomas-McSwain, Inc. v. Atlantic Life Insurance
90 S.E. 1022 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1916)
McKnight v. Dyson
74 S.E. 753 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1912)
Langford v. Jenkins
74 S.E. 380 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1912)
Simmons v. Mason
70 S.E. 898 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1911)
Bowen v. Johnson
69 S.E. 294 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 S.E. 1, 85 S.C. 82, 1910 S.C. LEXIS 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barker-v-thomas-sc-1910.