Barker v. State

109 S.W.2d 1062, 133 Tex. Crim. 205, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 500
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Barker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 132 Tex. Crim. 80
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 10, 1937·No. No. 19189.·Published

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge. —

The offense is forgery; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment appears regular. The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception. •

In the absence of the evidence adduced upon the trial this court is unable to appraise the matters presented in the motion for new trial.

Finding no érror justifying a reversal, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barker v. State, 109 S.W.2d 1062, 133 Tex. Crim. 205, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 500 (Tex. 1937).

109 S.W.2d 1062 (Barker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.