Barker v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Barker v. State

102 So. 919, 20 Ala. App. 672

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 20, 1925

Docket7 Div. 74.

StatusPublished

This text of 102 So. 919 (Barker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barker v. State, 102 So. 919, 20 Ala. App. 672 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The offense charged against this defendant was violating the prohibition laws of the state. The prosecution originated in the county court, and from a judgment of conviction in said court he took an appeal to the circuit court. He was there tried by the court, without a jury, and was again convicted, and appealed. There is no bill of exceptions. The record proper is regular; therefore the judgment of conviction rendered in the circuit court against this appellant will stand affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

The offense charged against this defendant was violating the prohibition laws of the state. The prosecution originated in the county court, and from a judgment of conviction in said court he took an appeal to the circuit court. He was there tried by the court, without a jury, and was again convicted, and appealed. There is no bill of exceptions. The record proper is regular; therefore the judgment of conviction rendered in the circuit court against this appellant will stand affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 So. 919, 20 Ala. App. 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barker-v-state-alactapp-1925.