Barker v. Stanford

53 Cal. 451
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1879·No. No. 5956·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By the Court, Rhodes J.:

The order made by the Probate Court, on the 11th day of July, 1859, is an order of final distribution. The funds in the hands of the administratrix were ordcrec) “ to be held and managed by her in trust, in pursuance of the will of the deceased, for the children of the deceased ”; and she thereupon took the funds and thereafter held them in her capacity as trustee. [456]*456Having taken the funds in that capacity, she was no longer subject, in respect to those funds, to the orders of the Probate Court, as the administratrix of the estate of the deceased. The sureties upon her bond as administratrix did not become liable for her acts or default as such trustee in the application of the funds.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barker v. Stanford, 53 Cal. 451 (Cal. 1879).

53 Cal. 451 (Barker v. Stanford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United State of America v. Dwyer
335 P.2d 718 (California Court of Appeal, 1959)
In re the Estate of Quimby
92 A. 56 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1914)
Morffew v. S.F. & San Rafael R.R.
40 P. 810 (California Supreme Court, 1895)