Barker v. Smith

Appellate Court of Illinois

Barker v. Smith

116 Ill. App. 66, 1904 Ill. App. LEXIS 22

DecidedSeptember 9, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 116 Ill. App. 66 (Barker v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barker v. Smith, 116 Ill. App. 66, 1904 Ill. App. LEXIS 22 (Ill. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Higbee

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a trial of the rights of property originating before a justice of the peace of Hamilton county. There was a judgment before the justice in favor of appellee and an appeal taken by the appellant here, to the County Court. That court, upon motion of appellee, dismissed the appeal and appellant brought the case to this court, where the judgment of the County Court was reversed and the cause remanded. Barker v. Smith, 90 Ill. App. 595. The case was afterwards tried upon its merits before a jury in the County Court and the result was again favorable to appellee. A careful examination of the record filed in this court fails to disclose any assignment" of errors. It has been repeatedly held that the failure to assign errors upon the record is not a mere matter of form, to be considered waived if not objected to, but one of substance. Ætna Life Ins. Co. v. Sanford, 197 Ill. 310; Davis v. Lang, 153 Ill. 175; Ditch v. Sennott, 116 Ill. 288; Baldwin v. Schwall, 106 Ill. App. 16; Cessna v. Benedict, 98 Ill. App. 440; Jesse French Piano and Organ Co. v. Meehan, 77 Ill. App. 577. By reason of the failure of appellant to assign errors upon the record there is nothing before us for our consideration and therefore the judgment must be affirmed or the appeal dismissed.

We have, however, examined the record submitted-to us notwithstanding the want of an assignment of errors, and are of the opinion that the merits of the case are with the appellee and that the judgment of the court below should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Higbee

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a trial of the rights of property originating before a justice of the peace of Hamilton county. There was a judgment before the justice in favor of appellee and an appeal taken by the appellant here, to the County Court. That court, upon motion of appellee, dismissed the appeal and appellant brought the case to this court, where the judgment of the County Court was reversed and the cause remanded. Barker v. Smith, 90 Ill. App. 595. The case was afterwards tried upon its merits before a jury in the County Court and the result was again favorable to appellee. A careful examination of the record filed in this court fails to disclose any assignment" of errors. It has been repeatedly held that the failure to assign errors upon the record is not a mere matter of form, to be considered waived if not objected to, but one of substance. Ætna Life Ins. Co. v. Sanford, 197 Ill. 310; Davis v. Lang, 153 Ill. 175; Ditch v. Sennott, 116 Ill. 288; Baldwin v. Schwall, 106 Ill. App. 16; Cessna v. Benedict, 98 Ill. App. 440; Jesse French Piano and Organ Co. v. Meehan, 77 Ill. App. 577. By reason of the failure of appellant to assign errors upon the record there is nothing before us for our consideration and therefore the judgment must be affirmed or the appeal dismissed.

We have, however, examined the record submitted-to us notwithstanding the want of an assignment of errors, and are of the opinion that the merits of the case are with the appellee and that the judgment of the court below should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 Ill. App. 66, 1904 Ill. App. LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barker-v-smith-illappct-1904.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack