Barker v. Marietta Guano Co.

37 S.E. 379, 112 Ga. 305, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 132
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 28, 1900·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Fish, J.

1. Absence of a party for providential cause is not aground for a continuance of the case, unless his counsel states in his place that he can’not go safely to trial without the presence of his client. Civil Code, § 5131.

2. There was evidence sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no abuse of discretion in overruling the motion for anew trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barker v. Marietta Guano Co., 37 S.E. 379, 112 Ga. 305, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 132 (Ga. 1900).

37 S.E. 379 (Barker v. Marietta Guano Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Flood v. Empire Investment Co.
133 S.E. 60 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)