Barker v. Marietta Guano Co.
37 S.E. 379, 112 Ga. 305, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 132
This text of 37 S.E. 379 (Barker v. Marietta Guano Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Barker v. Marietta Guano Co., 37 S.E. 379, 112 Ga. 305, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 132 (Ga. 1900).
Opinion
1. Absence of a party for providential cause is not aground for a continuance of the case, unless his counsel states in his place that he can’not go safely to trial without the presence of his client. Civil Code, § 5131.
2. There was evidence sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no abuse of discretion in overruling the motion for anew trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Flood v. Empire Investment Co.
133 S.E. 60 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
37 S.E. 379, 112 Ga. 305, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barker-v-marietta-guano-co-ga-1900.