Barker v. Marietta Guano Co.
37 S.E. 379, 112 Ga. 305, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 132
Opinion
1. Absence of a party for providential cause is not aground for a continuance of the case, unless his counsel states in his place that he can’not go safely to trial without the presence of his client. Civil Code, § 5131.
2. There was evidence sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no abuse of discretion in overruling the motion for anew trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barker v. Marietta Guano Co., 37 S.E. 379, 112 Ga. 305, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 132 (Ga. 1900).
37 S.E. 379 (Barker v. Marietta Guano Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Flood v. Empire Investment Co.
133 S.E. 60 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)