Barker v. Lappas

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Barker v. Lappas

412 S.W.2d 263, 1967 Ky. LEXIS 423

CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky

DecidedMarch 3, 1967

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 412 S.W.2d 263 (Barker v. Lappas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barker v. Lappas, 412 S.W.2d 263, 1967 Ky. LEXIS 423 (Ky. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

MILLIKEN, Judge.

This action stems from the decision rendered by this Court involving the same parties in Lappas et al. v. Barker et al., Ky., 375 S.W.2d 248 (1963).

After the trial court entered a judgment as directed by this Court, appellants — William L. Barker, Milton R. Barker, and Everett Pope — filed a motion in that court for leave to file an amended complaint. Over objection leave was granted and an amended complaint was filed. The trial court then subsequently dismissed the amended complaint. Appeal was taken to this Court, and appellees — Delmous Craig-head and James E. Smith — filed a cross-appeal on the grounds that the trial court erred in permitting the amended complaint to be filed.

Since no briefs were filed for appellants their appeal is dismissed. RCA 1.260(b).

Since the issue presented by the cross-appeal is now moot, that appeal is also dismissed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MILLIKEN, Judge.

This action stems from the decision rendered by this Court involving the same parties in Lappas et al. v. Barker et al., Ky., 375 S.W.2d 248 (1963).

After the trial court entered a judgment as directed by this Court, appellants — William L. Barker, Milton R. Barker, and Everett Pope — filed a motion in that court for leave to file an amended complaint. Over objection leave was granted and an amended complaint was filed. The trial court then subsequently dismissed the amended complaint. Appeal was taken to this Court, and appellees — Delmous Craig-head and James E. Smith — filed a cross-appeal on the grounds that the trial court erred in permitting the amended complaint to be filed.

Since no briefs were filed for appellants their appeal is dismissed. RCA 1.260(b).

Since the issue presented by the cross-appeal is now moot, that appeal is also dismissed.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

412 S.W.2d 263, 1967 Ky. LEXIS 423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barker-v-lappas-kyctapp-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack