Barker v. Gold Kist, Inc.
217 S.E.2d 195, 135 Ga. App. 224, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1623
Opinion
In this suit on a promissory note, the plaintiff was granted summary judgment. The motion was based on the pleadings only. Defendant’s answer denied all material allegations of the complaint and additionally affirmatively pleaded want of consideration and fraud [225]*225and duress. It is apparent therefore that material issues of fact are present and it was error to grant the motion.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barker v. Gold Kist, Inc., 217 S.E.2d 195, 135 Ga. App. 224, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1623 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975).
217 S.E.2d 195 (Barker v. Gold Kist, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jones v. Howard
264 S.E.2d 587 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Stratton & McLendon, Inc. v. CAMERON-BROWN COMPANY
231 S.E.2d 447 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)