Barker v. Gold Kist, Inc.
This text of 217 S.E.2d 195 (Barker v. Gold Kist, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this suit on a promissory note, the plaintiff was granted summary judgment. The motion was based on the pleadings only. Defendant’s answer denied all material allegations of the complaint and additionally affirmatively pleaded want of consideration and fraud [225]*225and duress. It is apparent therefore that material issues of fact are present and it was error to grant the motion.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
217 S.E.2d 195, 135 Ga. App. 224, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barker-v-gold-kist-inc-gactapp-1975.