Barker v. Gold Kist, Inc.

217 S.E.2d 195, 135 Ga. App. 224, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1623
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 19, 1975
Docket50655
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 217 S.E.2d 195 (Barker v. Gold Kist, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barker v. Gold Kist, Inc., 217 S.E.2d 195, 135 Ga. App. 224, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1623 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

In this suit on a promissory note, the plaintiff was granted summary judgment. The motion was based on the pleadings only. Defendant’s answer denied all material allegations of the complaint and additionally affirmatively pleaded want of consideration and fraud [225]*225and duress. It is apparent therefore that material issues of fact are present and it was error to grant the motion.

Submitted May 6, 1975 Decided June 19, 1975. M. Dale English, for appellant. Griffis & Thomas, Virgil D. Griffis, for appellee.

Judgment reversed.

Webb and Marshall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Howard
264 S.E.2d 587 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Stratton & McLendon, Inc. v. CAMERON-BROWN COMPANY
231 S.E.2d 447 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
217 S.E.2d 195, 135 Ga. App. 224, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barker-v-gold-kist-inc-gactapp-1975.