Barker v. Dominic
This text of 194 A.3d 292 (Barker v. Dominic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition by the defendants the city of Bridgeport and PMA Insurance Company for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court,
"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under General Statutes § 31-291, as construed by Massolini v. Driscoll,
D'AURIA, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
194 A.3d 292, 330 Conn. 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barker-v-dominic-conn-2018.