Barker v. Crompton-Highland Mills Inc.

39 S.E.2d 865, 201 Ga. 338, 1946 Ga. LEXIS 482
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 8, 1946
Docket15594.
StatusPublished

This text of 39 S.E.2d 865 (Barker v. Crompton-Highland Mills Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barker v. Crompton-Highland Mills Inc., 39 S.E.2d 865, 201 Ga. 338, 1946 Ga. LEXIS 482 (Ga. 1946).

Opinion

Atkinson, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) This case is controlled by the rulings made in Corley v. Crompton-Highland Mills Inc., ante.

As to George Chappell, Walter Cavender, Howard Chasteen, Linwood McGuffey, and Nathan Parker, none was a party to the original petition for injunction; nor does the record show that any of them had actual knowledge of the restraining order. Accordingly, it was error to hold them in contempt.

As to James Dunn, J. W. Short, and Wilbur Smith, though not parties to the original petition for injunction, each, in his testimony before the court, admitted knowledge of the contents of the restraining order; and there was sufficient evidence to authorize the judge to find that each had violated its terms; and therefore the court did not err in holding them in contempt.

W. P. Barker, Hozy Corley, and Hiram Giddens were each made defendants in the original petition for injunction, had been served with a copy of the petition and restraining order, and the evidence as to each was sufficient for the judge to find that each had violated the terms of the restraining order; and therefore it was not error to hold them in contempt.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed as to James Dunn, J. W. Short, Wilbur Smith, W.' P. Barker, Hozy Corley, and Hiram Giddens; and reversed as to George Chappell, Walter Cavender, Howard Chasteen, Linwood McGuffey, and Nathan Parker.

Judgment affirmed in part, and reversed in part.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 S.E.2d 865, 201 Ga. 338, 1946 Ga. LEXIS 482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barker-v-crompton-highland-mills-inc-ga-1946.