Barker v. Conley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Barker v. Conley

242 A.D. 808

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1934·Published

Opinion

Order modified by striking out the provision stating the specific questions to be submitted to the jury and substituting for such questions the general issue relating to the defense based on a release and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent. No decision upon the motion should be made until after the verdict of the jury has been received. All concur, except Edgcomb and Crosby, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal and [809]*809dismissal of the complaint. Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified by striking out the provision stating the specific questions to be submitted to the jury and substituting for such questions the general issue relating to the defense based on a release and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent. No decision upon the motion should be made until after the verdict of the jury has been received. All concur, except Edgcomb and Crosby, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal and [809]*809dismissal of the complaint. Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Barker v. Conley, 242 A.D. 808 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

242 A.D. 808 (Barker v. Conley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.