Barker v. Conley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Barker v. Conley

242 A.D. 808

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 242 A.D. 808 (Barker v. Conley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barker v. Conley, 242 A.D. 808 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Order modified by striking out the provision stating the specific questions to be submitted to the jury and substituting for such questions the general issue relating to the defense based on a release and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent. No decision upon the motion should be made until after the verdict of the jury has been received. All concur, except Edgcomb and Crosby, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal and [809]*809dismissal of the complaint. Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified by striking out the provision stating the specific questions to be submitted to the jury and substituting for such questions the general issue relating to the defense based on a release and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent. No decision upon the motion should be made until after the verdict of the jury has been received. All concur, except Edgcomb and Crosby, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal and [809]*809dismissal of the complaint. Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 A.D. 808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barker-v-conley-nyappdiv-1934.