Barker v. Clark

56 A. 747, 72 N.H. 334, 1903 N.H. LEXIS 76
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedDecember 1, 1903
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 56 A. 747 (Barker v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barker v. Clark, 56 A. 747, 72 N.H. 334, 1903 N.H. LEXIS 76 (N.H. 1903).

Opinion

•Remick, J.

The will not only gave Sarah J. Crooker a life ■estate in the property in question, but it also, in language sufficiently clear, empowered her to dispose of the same for her maintenance and support when such course should become necessary. Burleigh v. Clough, 52 N. H. 267. The superior court has found *335 that at the time the land was sold by Mrs. Crooker it was necessary for,her support and maintenance to sell it, that all the proceeds of the sale were applied to her support and maintenance during her lifetime, that the sale was made in good faith, and that the land brought all it was worth. These facts bring the deed clearly within the power given by the will.

The evidence offered by the plaintiff tending to show that Mrs. Crooker was of unsound mind was, under the circumstances and so far as the plaintiff was concerned, immaterial and properly excluded. Hall v. Butterfield, 59 N. H. 354, 356.

Exception overruled.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roaf v. Champlin
107 A. 339 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 A. 747, 72 N.H. 334, 1903 N.H. LEXIS 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barker-v-clark-nh-1903.