Barker v. Barker

838 So. 2d 704, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2898, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 667
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Barker v. Barker. Read the opinion of the Court — 909 So. 2d 333
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 7, 2003·No. No. 5D02-1027·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Wade Barker appeals a final judgment awarding him custody of the parties’ two minor children, B.F.B. and K.A.B. He alleges, inter alia, that the trial court’s judgment confused the names of the two children, that there were omissions on the visitation schedule attached to the final judgment and that the court further erred in not entering an income deduction order. Brenda Barker does not dispute these claims.

We affirm the trial court’s custody determination and reverse for correction of judgment in regard to the names of the two children and the omissions on the visitation schedule. We further direct the trial court to file an income deduction order against the mother pursuant to section 61.1301, Florida Statutes (2002).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.

PETERSON, PALMER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barker v. Barker, 838 So. 2d 704, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2898, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 667 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

838 So. 2d 704 (Barker v. Barker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.