Barkelew v. Taylor

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Barkelew v. Taylor

8 N.J. Eq. 206

DecidedDecember 15, 1849

StatusPublished

This text of 8 N.J. Eq. 206 (Barkelew v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barkelew v. Taylor, 8 N.J. Eq. 206 (N.J. Ct. App. 1849).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chancellob.

Upon the facts in evidence I am of opinion that the grantees in the sheriff’s deed took the title to hold only as in mortgage; and that Peter W. Barkelew, since deceased, was entitled to redeem, and made the offer to redeem, and the tender of the money in time.

[218]*218It will be referred to a Master to ascertain what parts of the property have been sold, aud for what prices, and what parts of it still remain in the grantees named in the sheriff’s deed, &c., &c.

Order accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chancellob.

Upon the facts in evidence I am of opinion that the grantees in the sheriff’s deed took the title to hold only as in mortgage; and that Peter W. Barkelew, since deceased, was entitled to redeem, and made the offer to redeem, and the tender of the money in time.

[218]*218It will be referred to a Master to ascertain what parts of the property have been sold, aud for what prices, and what parts of it still remain in the grantees named in the sheriff’s deed, &c., &c.

Order accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 N.J. Eq. 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barkelew-v-taylor-njch-1849.