Barkai v. Mendez

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided August 18, 2021·No. 7:21-cv-04050·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ARIEL DAN BARKAI, Plaintiff, -against- GEORGE MENDEZ; ALICE LaSCHETT; 21-CV-4050 (KMK) GLENN CUMMINGS; RAY McCALLUGH; JEFF ORDER OF SERVICE WANNAMAKER; 4 OTHER JOHN DOE CLARKSTOWN POLICE OFFICERS; AND GEORGE HOEHMANN, CLARKSTOWN SUPERVISOR, Defendants. KENNETH M. KARAS, United States District Judge: Plaintiff, appearing pro se, brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Defendants violated his constitutional rights. By order dated May 12, 2021, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed without prepayment of fees, that is, in forma pauperis (IFP). DISCUSSION A. Service on Named Defendants Because Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed IFP, he is entitled to rely on the Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service. Walker v. Schult, 717 F.3d. 119, 123 n.6 (2d Cir. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process . . . in [IFP] cases.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) (the court must order the Marshals Service to serve if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed IFP)). Although Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally requires that summonses and the complaint be served within 90 days of the date the complaint is filed, Plaintiff is proceeding IFP and could not have served summonses and the complaint until the Court reviewed the complaint and ordered that a summons be issued. The Court therefore extends the time to serve until 90 days after the date summonses are issued. If the complaint is not served within that time, Plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to request an extension of time for service); see also Murray v. Pataki, 378 F. App’x 50, 52 (2d Cir. 2010) (“As long as the [plaintiff proceeding IFP] provides the information necessary to identify the defendant, the Marshals’ failure to effect service

automatically constitutes ‘good cause’ for an extension of time within the meaning of Rule 4(m).”). To allow Plaintiff to effect service on Defendants Clarkstown Supervisor George Hoehmann, Clarkstown Police Officer George Mendez, Sergeant Alice LaSchett, Lieutenant Glenn Cummings, Chief of Police Ray McCallugh, and Captain Jeff Wannamaker through the U.S. Marshals Service, the Clerk of Court is instructed to fill out a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form (“USM-285 form”) for each of these Defendants. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue summonses and deliver to the Marshals Service all the paperwork necessary for the Marshals Service to effect service upon the Defendants.

Plaintiff must notify the Court in writing if his address changes, and the Court may dismiss the action if Plaintiff fails to do so. B. John Doe Defendants Under Valentin v. Dinkins, a pro se litigant is entitled to assistance from the district court in identifying a defendant. 121 F.3d 72, 76 (2d Cir. 1997). In the complaint, Plaintiff supplies sufficient information to permit the Clarkstown Police Department to identify the John Doe Clarkstown police officers who were dispatched to Plaintiff’s location on April 28, 2020, as per Defendant LaSchett’s direction. It is therefore ordered that the Clarktown Town Attorney, who is the attorney for and agent of the Clarkstown Police Department, must ascertain the identity and badge number of each John Doe whom Plaintiff seeks to sue here and the address where the defendant may be served. The Clarkstown Town Attorney must provide this information to Plaintiff and the Court within sixty days of the date of this order. Within thirty days of receiving this information, Plaintiff must file an amended complaint naming the John Doe defendants. The amended complaint will replace, not supplement, the original complaint. An amended complaint form that Plaintiff should complete is attached to this

order. Once Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint, the Court will screen the amended complaint and, if necessary, issue an order directing the Clerk of Court to complete the USM-285 forms with the addresses for the named John Doe Defendants and deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service. CONCLUSION The Clerk of Court is instructed to issue summonses, complete the USM-285 forms with the addresses for Defendants Clarkstown Supervisor George Hoehmann, Clarkstown Police Officer George Mendez, Sergeant Alice LaSchett, Lieutenant Glenn Cummings, Chief of Police Ray McCallugh, and Captain Jeff Wannamaker, and deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service.

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order and the complaint to the Clarkstown Town Attorney at: 10 Maple Avenue, New City, New York 10956. An “Amended Complaint” form is attached to this order. Plaintiff has consented to electronic service of notices and documents in this action. (ECF No. 3.) The Clerk of Court is directed to mail an information package to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. Dated: August 18, 2021 iy White Plains, New York i =

KENNETH M. KARAS United States District Judge

DEFENDANTS AND SERVICE ADDRESSES

Clarkstown Supervisor George Hoehmann 10 Maple Avenue New City, New York 10956 Police Officer George Mendez Clarkstown Police Department 20 Maple Avenue New City, New York 10956 Lieutenant Glenn Cummings Clarkstown Police Department 20 Maple Avenue New City, New York 10956 Sergeant Alice LaSchett Clarkstown Police Department 20 Maple Avenue New City, New York 10956 Chief of Police Ray McCallugh Clarkstown Police Department 20 Maple Avenue New City, New York 10956 Captain Jeff Wannamaker Clarkstown Police Department 20 Maple Avenue New City, New York 10956 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

CVE Write the full name of each plaintiff. (Include case number if one has been assigned)

“against- COMPLAINT (Prisoner) Do you want a jury trial? ssssssss...0.0.0. L1Yes LINo

Write the full name of each defendant. If you cannot fit the names of all of the defendants in the space provided, please write “see attached” in the space above and attach an additional sheet of paper with the full list of names. The names listed above must be identical to those contained in Section IV.

NOTICE The public can access electronic court files. For privacy and security reasons, papers filed with the court should therefore not contain: an individual’s full social security number or full birth date; the full name of a person known to be a minor; or a complete financial account number. A filing may include only: the last four digits of a social security number; the year of an individual’s birth; a minor’s initials; and the last four digits of a financial account number. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2.

Rev. 5/20/16

I. LEGAL BASIS FOR CLAIM State below the federal legal basis for your claim, if known. This form is designed primarily for prisoners challenging the constitutionality of their conditions of confinement; those claims are often brought under 42 U.S.C. §

Barkai v. Mendez, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Barkai v. Mendez (Barkai v. Mendez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murray v. Pataki
378 F. App'x 50 (Second Circuit, 2010)
Meilleur v. Strong
682 F.3d 56 (Second Circuit, 2012)
Walker v. Schult
717 F.3d 119 (Second Circuit, 2013)