Barish v. Szerlip

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Barish v. Szerlip

251 A.D. 854, 298 N.Y.S. 494, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7975

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 25, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.D. 854 (Barish v. Szerlip) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barish v. Szerlip, 251 A.D. 854, 298 N.Y.S. 494, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7975 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Order granting motion to dismiss the counterclaim of defendant East New York Mason Supply Co., Inc., for failure to prosecute and directing the county clerk of Kings county to cancel of record the two liens, one of which was filed by it for the sum of $1,411.89 on the 19th day of April, 1933, against the property known as No. 447 Sixth street, Brooklyn, and the other filed by it on the same day for the sum of $97.54, against the property known as No. 400 Sixth avenue, Brooklyn, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, unless within twenty days from the entry of the order hereon appellant proceed with the prosecution of its action against the respondents by proper application to the Special Term, as it may be advised; in which event the motion to dismiss the counterclaim is denied, without costs. No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting motion to dismiss the counterclaim of defendant East New York Mason Supply Co., Inc., for failure to prosecute and directing the county clerk of Kings county to cancel of record the two liens, one of which was filed by it for the sum of $1,411.89 on the 19th day of April, 1933, against the property known as No. 447 Sixth street, Brooklyn, and the other filed by it on the same day for the sum of $97.54, against the property known as No. 400 Sixth avenue, Brooklyn, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, unless within twenty days from the entry of the order hereon appellant proceed with the prosecution of its action against the respondents by proper application to the Special Term, as it may be advised; in which event the motion to dismiss the counterclaim is denied, without costs. No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D. 854, 298 N.Y.S. 494, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barish-v-szerlip-nyappdiv-1937.