Baringue v. Sanderson

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Baringue v. Sanderson

3 Teiss. 412

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 2, 1906

DocketNo. 3947

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Teiss. 412 (Baringue v. Sanderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baringue v. Sanderson, 3 Teiss. 412 (La. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

Opinions

MOORE, J.

Plaintiff sued the defendant firm and obtained [413]*413judgment against it and the individual members thereof, in solido.

April 2, 1906.

From this judgment the firm took a suspensive appeal and perfected same by giving a bond according to law. The individual members gave no bond and for this reason the dismissal of the appeal, as to them, is moved.

In Mrs. Irene Davenport vs. Wm. Adler & Co. No. 1918 of the docket of this Court we held that where the individual members of a firm are sued and condemned simply as an incident to and by reason of their membership in the firm, an appeal taken and perfected by the firm brings up the judgment for review as to the individual members.

We adhere to that ruling. The motion to dismiss is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MOORE, J.

Plaintiff sued the defendant firm and obtained [413]*413judgment against it and the individual members thereof, in solido.

April 2, 1906.

From this judgment the firm took a suspensive appeal and perfected same by giving a bond according to law. The individual members gave no bond and for this reason the dismissal of the appeal, as to them, is moved.

In Mrs. Irene Davenport vs. Wm. Adler & Co. No. 1918 of the docket of this Court we held that where the individual members of a firm are sued and condemned simply as an incident to and by reason of their membership in the firm, an appeal taken and perfected by the firm brings up the judgment for review as to the individual members.

We adhere to that ruling. The motion to dismiss is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Teiss. 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baringue-v-sanderson-lactapp-1906.