Baring v. Heyward
29 S.C.L. 553
This text of 29 S.C.L. 553 (Baring v. Heyward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Baring v. Heyward, 29 S.C.L. 553 (S.C. Ct. App. 1844).
Opinion
In this case this court is satisfied that the jury were properly instructed upon the law involved in it. The question of damages was within their discretion, and the court sees no reason to disturb their verdict, on account of any excess in that respect. The motion is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
29 S.C.L. 553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baring-v-heyward-scctapp-1844.